INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL BANK N.V. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
| INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL BANK N.V. |
| JANET YELLEN, BRADLEY T. SMITH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY |
| 1:2024cv03161 |
| November 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11287017) filed by INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL BANK N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for U.S. Dept. of Treasury, #3 Summons Summons for Janet Yellen, #4 Summons Summons for U.S. Dept. of Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control, #5 Summons Summons for Bradley T. Smith, #6 Summons Summons for Dept. of Justice Merrick Garland, #7 Summons Summons for Dept. of Justice Matthew Graves, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit, #23 Exhibit, #24 Exhibit, #25 Exhibit, #26 Exhibit, #27 Exhibit, #28 Exhibit, #29 Exhibit, #30 Exhibit)(Orenberg, Allen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
