ECCLES v. O'MALLEY
| TANISHA ECCLES |
| MARTIN J. O'MALLEY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2024cv03228 |
| November 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Richard J Leon |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Sertial on behalf of MARTIN J. O'MALLEY (Sertial, Heather) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (znmw) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to MARTIN J. O'MALLEY Electronic notice has been provided to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the U.S. Attorney's Office pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405g. Answer due by 1/22/2025. (znmw) |
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall assign this case randomly to a judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Ana C. Reyes on 11/19/24. (psu2)
|
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/15/2024. (zsl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TANISHA ECCLES. (Shea, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN J. O'MALLEY (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by TANISHA ECCLES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shea, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
