VAPE CENTRAL GROUP, LLC v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
| VAPE CENTRAL GROUP, LLC |
| FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROBERT M. CALIFF and XAVIER BECERRA |
| 1:2024cv03354 |
| November 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by VAPE CENTRAL GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of James C. Fraser, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration, #4 Exhibit B to Declaration)(Fraser, James) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by VAPE CENTRAL GROUP, LLC (Fraser, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against XAVIER BECERRA, ROBERT M. CALIFF, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11327202) filed by VAPE CENTRAL GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Commissioner Robert M. Califf, #3 Summons Food & Drug Administration, #4 Summons Secretary Xavier Becerra, #5 Summons Department of Health & Human Services, #6 Summons US Attorney Matthew Graves, #7 Summons Attorney General Merrick Garland)(Fraser, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
