FLORES GARCIA v. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION et al
| JUAN TOMAS FLORES GARCIA |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, OFFICER JOHN DOE B, OFFICER JOHN DOE A, U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2024cv03376 |
| December 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robin F. Thurston on behalf of JUAN TOMAS FLORES GARCIA (Thurston, Robin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Anne Morton on behalf of JUAN TOMAS FLORES GARCIA (Morton, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, OFFICER JOHN DOE A, OFFICER JOHN DOE B, U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ADCDC-11333385) filed by JUAN TOMAS FLORES GARCIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Summons - U.S. Customs and Border Protection, #3 Summons - U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #4 Summons - Alejandro Mayorkas, #5 Summons - Officer John Doe A, #6 Summons - Officer John Doe B, #7 Summons - U.S. Attorney General, #8 Summons - U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia)(Burra, Ananda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
