IN RE WILLIAM KEEN
| USA |
| WILLIAM KEEN |
| PRESS COALITION |
| 1:2024mc00011 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Jia M Cobb |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting the Press Coalition's application for access to video exhibits. See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 26, 2024. (lcjmc2)
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE re #1 Application pursuant to LCrR 57.6 filed by USA. (Mirabelli, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 RESPONSE re #1 Application pursuant to LCrR 57.6 (notice of no objection) filed by WILLIAM KEEN. (Schiffelbein, Benjamin) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: Having considered #1 the Press Coalition's application pursuant to LCrR 57.6 and Standing Order No. 21-28 (BAH) for access to video exhibits submitted by the Government during sentencing in United States v. William Keen, No. 23-cr-60 (JMC), the Court hereby ORDERS government counsel and defense counsel to file any objections to the application by February 22, 2024. The Court has provided government counsel and defense counsel with this minute order. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 15, 2024. (lcjmc2)
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION pursuant to LCrR 57.6 ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number 206526.) filed by PRESS COALITION.(znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
