REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY ALEXANDER ZENTEFIS
| REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY ALEXANDER ZENTEFIS |
| 1:2024mc00102 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 PACER Fee Exemption Request. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/16/2024. (lcjeb2)
|
| Filing 1 PACER Fee Exemption from ALEXANDER ZENTEFIS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Supplemental Information) (zjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY ALEXANDER ZENTEFIS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Unknown: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY ALEXANDER ZENTEFIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
