ROGERS et al
STEPHEN J. ROGERS, LINDA L. ROGERS, DONALD E. DURAN, JUDITH DURAN, DENISE RIZZO, ALL PLAINTIFFS and Murphy |
USA |
1:2007cv00273 |
May 1, 2007 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Mary Ellen Coster Williams |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 585 ORDER granting 527 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Calamaras' claim. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Copy to parties. |
Filing 548 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 220 Cross-Motions The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 10/15/2012. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Copy to parties. |
Filing 468 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 429 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Copy to parties. |
Filing 377 PUBLISHED OPINION granting 195 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 289 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 304 Motion to Strike. Status Conference set for 11/14/2011 at 11:00 ET.. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Copy to parties. |
Filing 349 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 310 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) |
Filing 337 PUBLISHED OPINION: Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 328 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) |
Filing 210 PUBLISHED OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) |
Filing 115 PUBLISHED OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) |
Filing 84 ORDER . Plaintiffs shall file a notice to the Court and Parties by February 2, 2009. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall file supplemental briefing by February 16, 2009. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (ms4) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.