Cenecharl v. Inch et al
| Jean Cenecharl |
| Julie Jones, Mark S. Inch, FNU Robbins, Mr. Murphy, FNU Conner and Ms. Roberts |
| Ms. Robbins, Mark S Inch, Conner, CPL. Roberts and Asst. Warden Murphy |
| 2:2019cv00718 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #9 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jean Cenecharl. Related case(s): no (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 11 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/3/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 10 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/3/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 9 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/17/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/3/2019. (SLU) |
Filing 8
ORDER regarding prisoner consent form and financial certificate. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/3/2019. (SLU)
|
| Filing 7 TRANSFER IN from the Southern District of Florida. Case assigned to District Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New Case Number: 2:19-cv-718-FtM-60NPM. (SLU) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 9:19-cv-81104. File received electronically |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; terminating #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; Adopting #4 Report and Recommendations. Certificate of Appealability: No Ruling Closing Case. Motions terminated: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jean Cenecharl, #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jean Cenecharl Recommending that this court transfer this cause to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz) [Transferred from flsd on 10/2/2019.]
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jean Cenecharl; Recommending that this court transfer this cause to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Objections to R&R due by 9/30/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) [Transferred from flsd on 10/2/2019.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jean Cenecharl. (ar2) [Transferred from flsd on 10/2/2019.] |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ar2) [Transferred from flsd on 10/2/2019.] |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Conner, Mark S. Inch, Julie Jones, Murphy, Robbins, Roberts. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Jean Cenecharl.(ar2) [Transferred from flsd on 10/2/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
