Scott v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office et al
| Scott and Jeffrey Scott |
| Charlotte County Sheriff's Office and Bill Prummell |
| 2:2020cv00172 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER to strike re: #13 Motion for Copies filed by Jeffrey Scott. The Clerk is DIRECTED to return the motion to Plaintiff along with a blank copy of the Court's civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/24/2020. (SLU)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Copies by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. Modified on 4/29/2020 (SLU). STRICKEN and returned pursuant to #14 |
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SLU) |
|
Filing 11
OPINION AND ORDER this case is DISMISSED without prejudice re: #1 Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment, terminate any pending motions as moot, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/22/2020. (SLU)
|
| Filing 10 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jeffrey Scott. Related case(s): did not state (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER dismissing without prejudice re #1 Complaint. The Charlotte County Sheriff's Office is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Jeffrey Scott may file an amended complaint on or before April 17, 2020. Failure to file a timely amended complaint or request an extension of time to do so will lead the Court to dismiss this case without further notice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a blank civil rights form marked "amended complaint" with the assigned case number. Plaintiff is also reminded that Local Rule 1.05 requires all filings with the Court to be submitted on one side of the paper. The Court thus warns Plaintiff it will strike and return any more two-sided filings. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/27/2020. (SLU)
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT (part of evidence of claim) re #1 Complaint by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER regarding prisoner consent form and financial certificate. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/25/2020. (SLU)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION (submitted and filed as a double sided pleading) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 3/27/2020. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/13/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/13/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (submitted and filed as a double sided pleading) against Charlotte County Sheriff's Office, Bill Prummell filed by Jeffrey Scott. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (no fee/ifp; no service copies)(SLU) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
