Despart v. Hoang Le et al
Thomas G. Despart and Thomas Despart |
Yen Hoang Le, Antoria Blanding and Dr. Yen Hoang Le |
2:2024cv00146 |
February 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Antoria Blanding, Yen Hoang Le filed by Thomas G. Despart (e-portal). Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Thomas G. Despart.(ABM) |
|
|
Filing 7 NOTICE by Thomas G. Despart (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas G. Despart. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all confined pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/20/2024. (WRW) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/20/2024. (WRW) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas G. Despart. (ABM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antoria Blanding, Yen Hoang Le filed by Thomas G. Despart. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(ABM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.