Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Despart v. Hoang Le et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Despart and Thomas Despart
Defendant:
Yen Hoang Le, Antoria Blanding and Dr. Yen Hoang Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DESPART v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DESPART
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESPART v. DCF et al
as 4:2019cv00287
Defendant:
DCF, FCCC DIRECTOR and DONALD SAWYER
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DESPART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Despart v. State Of Florida
as 6:2019cv00563
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Plaintiff:
Thomas Despart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Despart v. State Of Florida
as 2:2019cv00186
Defendant:
State Of Florida and Donald Sawyer
Plaintiff:
Thomas Despart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Despart v. Attack
as 6:2018cv01841
Defendant:
Craig Attack
Plaintiff:
Thomas Despart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Despart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2008cv00183
Petitioner:
Thomas Despart
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Despart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2007cv01563
Petitioner:
Thomas Despart
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Despart v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 6:2007cv00737
Petitioner:
Thomas Despart
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Despart v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 2:2007cv00255
Petitioner:
Thomas Despart
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
