Walker v. Marceno et al
| Kenneth Lee Walker |
| Carmine Marceno, Bill Prummell, Sgt. Frederick Myers, Deputy Vollmer, Justin Bonsall, Deputy McPherson, Officer Kazuik, Deputy John M. Smith, Jane Doe Officer 1 and John Doe Officers 1-15 |
| 2:2026cv01511 |
| May 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must pay the filing fee by July 21, 2026. A failure to comply with this order or timely seek relief from it may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 7/7/2026. (TLP)
|
| Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/22/2026. (WRW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Kenneth Lee Walker. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Kenneth Lee Walker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Exhibits A-E, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Cover Letter, #6 Mailing Envelope)(LAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.