Rojas v. Dawsy et al
| Nestor Rivera Rojas |
| Jeffrey J. Dawsy, Dodi Pruitt, Jeremy Laughlin, Mike Kanter, Juan Santiago, Daniel Keszthelyi, Jesi Barron, David Decarlo, Christopher Cornell, Edward Blair, Corey Allen, Gail Tierany, Sherry Cook, Michelle Shomer, Citrus County Sheriff's Office and Angela Vick |
| 5:2015cv00348 |
| July 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Martin |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER denying without prejudice #14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 3/4/2016. (CDW)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for emergency injunction by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) |
| Filing 13 JUDGMENT entered. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (LMF) |
|
Filing 12
ORDERED that the Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, to terminate any pending motions and to close the file. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 11/17/2015. (CDW)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for service by the US Marshal by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #3 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial fee of $ 20.00 and is assessed the total filing fee of $350.00. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Supervisor, Inmate Trust Funds at Plaintiffs current place of incarceration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/31/15. (LMF)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for Service, titled "Notice of Compliance to Order Doc. 5 and Request for Service of Process." by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) |
| Filing 7 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) |
| Received one incomplete Summons and one identical copy of complaint. (LAB) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of service by Nestor Rivera Rojas re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice. (LAB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing petitioner to either file a completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this Order; re #3 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency filed by Nestor Rivera Rojas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/4/2015. (LAB)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for the Court to order service be processed by the US Marshals by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency with inmate account statement by Nestor Rivera Rojas. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. Modified on 7/30/2015 (LAB). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/21/2015. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(MJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Nestor Rivera Rojas.(LAB) (No fees paid, Received 16 service copies of complaint) Modified on 7/14/2015 (LAB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
