Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Rodriguez et al v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority et al
as 3:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Hector Cardona, Edwin Lozada, Juan Santiago and others
Defendant:
Doriel Pagn Crespo and Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collaguazo Guamancela v. Garland
as 23-7756
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTIAGO COLLAGUAZO GUAMANCELA, ERIKA ANDREA ROCANO SUCUZHANAY and CARLOS AARON COLLAGUAZO ROCANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUAN SANTIAGO and MADISON SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juan Santiago Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTIAGO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Santiago v. Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC
as 1:2022cv05784
Petitioner:
Juan Santiago
Respondent:
Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19421
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTIAGO, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12790
Plaintiff:
JOSE JUAN SANTIAGO and JOSE J SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO LABOY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11300
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTIAGO LABOY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
