Lopez v. Lane et al
Kathy S Lopez |
Kathy Lane and Michael Carvajal |
5:2021cv00001 |
January 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Brian J Davis |
Philip R Lammens |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered dismissing case without prejudice. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (HAI) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order; dismissing the case without prejudice; instructions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 1/11/2021. (KLC) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT in Support of re: #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order titled "Order to Show Cause" by Kathy S Lopez. (RLK) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kathy S Lopez. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
Filing 2 MOTION to Seal by Kathy S Lopez. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Kathy S Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.