Acosta v. Harris et al
| Ramon Acosta |
| K. Harris, Vjuarbe, M. Cortopassi, K Torres, W Parris, FNU Salem, Linda Criswell, S Mezyk, Z Guadarrama, Richard Li and FNU Frazier |
| 5:2021cv00588 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER to show cause why Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee or request to proceed as a pauper within 30 days from the commencement of the action. Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either submit the $402.00 filing fee or complete and file the enclosed Affidavit of Indigency. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank Affidavit of Indigency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/4/2022. (RLK)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 12/2/2021. (RLK)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Cortopassi, Linda Criswell, FNU Frazier, Z Guadarrama, K. Harris, Richard Li, S Mezyk, W Parris, FNU Salem, K Torres, Vjuarbe filed by Ramon Acosta.(no fees paid, no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
