Gorbey v. Davis et al
| Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather Gorbey |
| Brian J. Davis, Federal Bureau of Prisions, John Doe # 1, Lt. FNU Phelps, John Doe # 2, FNU Withers, FNU Miller, FNU Dooboo, FNU Faulkner, FNU Eldridge, FNU Valistero, FNU Berman, FNU Bostick, FNU Harr and John/Jane Does |
| 5:2023cv00429 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/1/2023. (BGR) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and directing to Clerk to terminate any pending motions, enter judgment, and close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/31/2023. (CCB)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 7/10/2023. (LAB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Michael S. Gorbey. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael S. Gorbey. (No service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
