Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS, 2ND CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00882
Petitioner:
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey and Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Gorbey v. Warden
as 24-2155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP Coleman 1
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
In re: Michael Gorbey
as 24-1259
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024fp00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
