Hobbs v. Johnson and Johnson et al
| Wade Hobbs |
| Johnson and Johnson, Walmart and Walgreens |
| 6:2022cv00711 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 UNILATERAL CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Holmes, Brandon) Modified text on 6/10/2022 (LDJ). |
Filing 31
ORDER denying without prejudice #26 and #27 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 6/9/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Consent to Dismissal of Claims Against Johnson and Johnson by Johnson and Johnson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brigman, Lindsay) Modified text on 6/10/2022 (LDJ). |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE TO #24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Wade Hobbs. (BD) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER granting #25 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 6/9/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 27 First MOTION for Andrew D Tharp to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19656804 for $150 for Special Admission by Johnson and Johnson. (Brigman, Lindsay) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 26 First MOTION for Taylor B. Mayes to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19656760 for $150 for Special Admission by Johnson and Johnson. (Brigman, Lindsay) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 25 First MOTION for Michael B. Hewes to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19656610 for $150 and Written Designation and Consent to Act by Johnson and Johnson. (Brigman, Lindsay) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
|
Filing 24
ORDER to show cause: The parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by a written response filed on or before June 20, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed, pursuant to Local Rule 3.10, for lack of prosecution due to the non-filing of a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 6/6/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Judicial Notice by Wade Hobbs (HAI) Modified on 6/2/2022 (KNC). |
|
Filing 22
ENDORSED ORDER denying #21 Motion for Extension of Time. The Local Rules do not require Plaintiff to be admitted to the bar of any district or state to represent himself. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 5/23/2022. (Kidd, Embry)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for 141 Day Extension of Time to Respond to All Motions and Orders by Wade Hobbs. (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Walgreens. Related case(s): No (Coleman, James) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Walgreens. (Coleman, James) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lindsay Topping Brigman on behalf of Johnson and Johnson. Lead Counsel: Lindsay Topping Brigman. (Brigman, Lindsay) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Topping Brigman on behalf of Johnson and Johnson (Brigman, Lindsay) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE to counsel Michael B. Hewes, Taylor Mayes, and Andrew Tharp Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KNC) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Johnson and Johnson. (Reed, Michael) |
| Filing 14 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Johnson and Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Reed, Michael) Modified on 5/12/2022 (removed duplicate text) (KNC). |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Defendant's #10 Motion to Dismiss filed by Wade Hobbs. (BD) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #8 Motion for a More Definite Statement filed by Wade Hobbs. (BD) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Walmart. (Holmes, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, MOTION to Strike Claim for Joint and Several Liability and Post Judgment Interest, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Walgreens. (Coleman, James) Modified on 5/2/2022 (matched text to pleading) (KNC). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by James A. Coleman on behalf of Walgreens (Coleman, James) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Walmart. (Holmes, Brandon) |
| Reset deadlines: for Walmart. Response to Complaint due 5/10/2022. (KNC) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Because the parties may not stipulate to an extension of time, the Court construes the stipulation as a motion to extend the time to respond to the Complaint. Defendant may have until and through May 10, 2022, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 4/21/2022. (Kidd, Embry)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 4/20/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal /Complaint by Walmart. (Holmes, Brandon) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 4/14/2022. (PML)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 8:22-cv-00711-WWB-EJK. (APV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court in and for Seminole County, case number 2022-CA-000601 filed in State Court on March 11, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19457082 filed by Walmart. (Attachments: #1 State Court Other Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Holmes, Brandon) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2022: #3 State Court Complaint, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Pending State Court motion) (BD). Modified on 4/14/2022 to correct docket text and attachments (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
