Joyner v. United States of America et al
| Nicole Marie Joyner |
| United States of America, FBI, U.S. Capitol Police, January 6 Committee and Unknown Federal Agents |
| 6:2025cv02494 |
| December 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically reasonable disability accommodations under the rehabilitation act; OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations by Nicole Marie Joyner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(TDC) |
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #8 Motion for Extension of Time, Request for Appointment of Counsel, and Request for Disability Accommodation. Contrary to Plaintiff's representation in the first paragraph, the Court did NOT enter an order on 3/23/2026 directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 14 days. Accordingly, the remainder of the Motion, based on that incorrect premise, fails to state a legal or factual basis for relief. No date has been set by the district judge for the filing of an amended pleading, as the report and recommendation is pending for consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 4/2/2026. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time, Request for Appointment of Counsel, and Request for Disability Accommodation re #1 Complaint, by Nicole Marie Joyner. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Nicole Marie Joyner. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that: the Motion (Doc. 2) be DENIED without prejudice; and the Complaint (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED with leave to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 3/23/2026. (TNP) |
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER directing Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen days from the date of this Order as to why they did not comply with the Court's #3 Initial Order and the Local Rules by failing to file their Notice of Pendency of Related Actions and Disclosure Statement. Alternatively, Plaintiff may cure their failure by fully complying with the Initial Order within fourteen days, thereby discharging the order to show cause. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/27/2026. (MEH)
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (TNP)
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/6/2026. (ALL)
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/6/2026. (ALL)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Nicole Marie Joyner. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Attachment not able to get darker to view)(MSN) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Nicole Marie Joyner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2b, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Attachment, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Letter to Clerk)(MSN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.