Cases 1 - 10 of 3,044
Morrow v. United States et al
as 3:2025cv00753
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrow
Defendant:
United States, Oregon State, Clackamas County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rutledge v. FBI et al
as 3:2025cv00306
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge
Defendant:
FBI, Darpa (Defense Advance Research Project Agency), Duke University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv11229
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc, Andrea Joy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(HC) Iagounov v. FBI et al
as 2:2025cv01258
Petitioner:
Anton Iagounov
Respondent:
FBI, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California and NASA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alford v. Wray
as 25-1096
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ALFORD
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, FBI, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAVIEW TOWERS TENANTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2025cv80523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Fisenko et al v. Torres et al
as 3:2025cv05365
Plaintiff:
Olga Fisenko and Vladimir Nikolenko
Defendant:
Flor Torres, Augusto Penaloza, Dr Patricia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Brito v. Congress et al
as 2:2025cv01231
Plaintiff:
Froy Diaz Brito
Defendant:
Congress, United States Marine Corps, Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saswot Dhakal v. USA, et al
as 25-5153
Plaintiff:
Saswot Dhakal
Defendant:
United States of America, John Does, Of the FBI and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Thurman et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2025cv03099
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Torres Thurman and Maria Longoria Torres
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), MFBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
