Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Emerson v. Match Group LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emerson
Defendant:
Match Group LLC, Toledo FBI and Detroit FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Church et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church, Bill Church, Ku Klux Klan and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Directors, Past and Present of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cary et al v. Huttenlockers et al
as 2:2023cv13196
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary and Erica Stearns
Defendant:
Brian Huttenlockers, Easter, Frytt and others
Scott v. FBI Louisville KY headquarters
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
FBI Louisville KY headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11761
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Zloza v. Chicago Bridge and Iron et al
as 1:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge and Iron, Holland, City of and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
