Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Emerson v. Match Group LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emerson
Defendant:
Match Group LLC, Toledo FBI and Detroit FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Georgopoulos v. FBI et al
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Anthony Georgopoulos
Defendant:
FBI, CIA and DIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Beaver Creek Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV
Defendant:
Beaver Creek Police Dept. and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Stephen Anthony, David Kasulones, Private Security Company Contracted at Louis Stokes for Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ainsley v. United States Air Force, et al
as 1:2021cv01795
Plaintiff:
Absynth Ainsley
Defendant:
United States Air Force, NASA, Targeted Individual Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
