Orloski v. Terrorist Screening Center et al
| Christopher Orloski |
| Terrorist Screening Center, National Counterterrorism Center, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Transportation Security Administration, Transportation Security Intelligence Services, Transportation Security Operations Center, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and Does 1 to 100 |
| 8:2018cv00709 |
| March 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER denying (Doc. # 44 ) Motion for Reconsideration. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/13/2018. (KAK)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge is requested to undertake a renewed analysis of Plaintiff's Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, to make reduced payments on a payment plan. Those Motions (Doc. ## 2 , 3 , 8 ) remain referred to Judge Pizzo for the issuance of a Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/8/2018. (KAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
