Rigney et al v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Kyle Adams and Shawn Rigney
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 8:2019cv01432
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Mary S Scriven
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #13 the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay Case, and All Deadlines, While Parties Complete Mediation. The Parties shall complete mediation and file a joint mediation report on or before September 20, 2019. If the matter is not resolved, the stay will be lifted and the Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before October 11, 2019. No further extension of the response deadline will be permitted absent highlyextenuating circumstances or the need to formalize an agreed settlement. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 8/2/2019. (GMD)
July 30, 2019 Filing 13 Joint MOTION to stay Case, and All Deadlines, while Parties Complete Mediation by All Plaintiffs. (Hill, Brandon)
July 26, 2019 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Kyle Adams, Shawn Rigney. (Hill, Brandon)
July 26, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #7 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Kyle Adams, Shawn Rigney. Related case(s): Y (Hill, Brandon)
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #9 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time for Plaintiffs to Seek Class Certification Under Rule 23. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for class certification is hereby extended up to and until October 15, 2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/23/2019. (GMD)
July 19, 2019 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification by All Plaintiffs. (Hill, Brandon)
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/19/2019. (KTT)
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 8/2/2019. Counsel are relieved of the requirement to file a Case Management Report within the time prescribed. The Court is issuing a scheduling order sua sponte. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/19/2019. (KTT)
July 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #5 Defendant Target Corporation's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including July 31, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/17/2019. (GMD)
July 16, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 4 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #1 Notice of Removal Defendant Target Corporation's Second Unopposed Motion for Extensionof Time to Respond to Complaint by Target Corporation. (Austin, Michael)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #3 Defendant Target Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including July 22, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 6/14/2019. (GMD)
June 14, 2019 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Target Corporation. (Austin, Michael)
June 13, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-1432-T-35JSS. (SJB)
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL Defendant Target Corporation's Notice of Removal from In the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, case number 19-CA-005102 filed in State Court on 05/15/19. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15575442 filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Austin, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rigney et al v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Michael Garrett Austin
Represented By: Joseph M. Wasserkrug
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Adams
Represented By: Chad Andrew Justice
Represented By: Brandon J. Hill
Represented By: Luis A. Cabassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Rigney
Represented By: Chad Andrew Justice
Represented By: Brandon J. Hill
Represented By: Luis A. Cabassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?