BELL v. JACOBSEN et al
| RICHARD ALLEN BELL |
| JACOBSEN, JOHN DOE 1, NEEL, STOKES, RICKY DIXON and JACOBSON |
| 3:2022cv04701 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO #10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #14 RESPONSE TO #10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
Filing 13
ORDER. The Court's May 5, 2022 Order to Show Cause, ECF Doc. #10 , is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff's Motion to Request an Extension of Time, ECF Doc. #12 , is DENIED AS MOOT. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners in actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file either a notice of voluntary dismissal or a second amended complaint. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/17/2022. (mb)
|
| Set Deadlines re #13 ORDER. (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal or SECOND Amended COMPLAINT due by 6/7/2022). (mb) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Request an Extension of Time, by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #12 MOTION for Extension of Time. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
| Filing 11 Initial Partial Filing fee: $ 12.76, receipt number FLN3-15378. (BAL. $337.24). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: 11 Filing Fee Received, #10 Order to Show Cause, #7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to his failure to comply with a Court order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/5/2022. Show Cause Response due by 5/19/2022. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #7 Order. (Filing fee not received). (mb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COURT re #8 Amended Complaint by RICHARD ALLEN BELL (jcw) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE 1, JACOBSON, NEEL, STOKES, filed by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (No service copies filed. Page 14 is missing) (jcw) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Plaintiff's "Notice to the Court", docketed by the clerk as a Motion to Extend Time, (ECF Doc. #5 ), is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall have until 4/30/2022 to pay the initial partial filing fee of $12.76. Plaintiff's request for all other relief is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 4/15/2022. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #9 Notice to Court, #8 Amended Complaint. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Court re #4 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (Plaintiff's letter states he enclosed a check for $12.76 for the initial partial filing fee. No check was enclosed - payment not received). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 NOTICE to Court re 4 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (Plaintiff's letter states he enclosed a check for $12.76 for the initial partial filing fee. No check was enclosed - payment not received). (mb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time, (titled, "Notice to the Court"), by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Extend Time, (titled, "Notice to the Court"). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED to the extent this case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. The clerk shall assess Plaintiff $12.76 as an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff shall have twenty-one (21) days in which to submit the initial partial filing fee as assessed by the clerk. Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended), even though Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he must pay the entire $350.00 filing fee in full REGARDLESS OF THE DISPOSITION OF THE DISTRICT COURT CASE (including dismissal). The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to: The Department of Corrections. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis( Fee due by 4/19/2022.) (Cover Letter w/ORDER sent to FDOC). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 3/29/2022. (mb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICKY DIXON, JOHN DOE 1, JACOBSEN, NEEL, STOKES, filed by RICHARD ALLEN BELL. (No service copies). (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.