Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Neel v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Christina Neel
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdelaziz Hamze v. Settlemires, et al
as 24-10468
Plaintiff:
ABDELAZIZ BILAL HAMZE
Defendant:
SETTLEMIRES, KOSANOVICH, SIMMONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sanderson v. Reali et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dwight Sanderson
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Susan M. Stalnecker, William A. Hawkins, III and others
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Channel WALA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C.
Defendant:
Channel WALA LLC individually and together doing business as Channel Wala doing business as Doordarshan, Parshva Distributor LLC individually and together doing business as Channel Wala doing business as Doordarshan, Abhishek Shah individually and together doing business as Channel Wala doing business as Doordarshan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bowden v. Reddish et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Elijah Tamar Bowden
Defendant:
Reddish, Lester Fernandez, H.L. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
