GRIFFIN v. LEAVINS et al
STEVEN J GRIFFIN |
DONALD LEAVINS and J SANTIAGO |
3:2022cv22756 |
November 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #12 Notice to the Court, #11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
Filing 12 Notice to the Court, by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (alb) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (alb) |
Filing 10 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, ECF Doc. #8 , is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff shall have until Tuesday, January 20, 2023, to file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion to compel, ECF Doc. #9 , is DENIED. The clerk is directed to send this Order to the SRCI Warden as a courtesy only to take whatever action the Warden may deem appropriate. (Completed IFP MOTION due by 1/20/2023).) (Courtesy copy of ORDER sent to WARDEN). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 1/4/2023. (mb) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Compel by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (jcw) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File as to #7 Order by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time, #9 MOTION to Compel. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jcw) |
Filing 7 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, ECF Doc. #6 , is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff shall have until Friday, January 6, 2023, to file a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis. All other relief is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/07/22. (jfj) |
Set Deadline re: #7 Order - IFP Motion due by 1/6/2023. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time by STEVEN J GRIFFIN.. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jfj) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (jfj) |
Filing 5 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Doc. #2 , is DENIED. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court's form needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners. This case number should be written on the form. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a second, complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis on this Court's form. Plaintiff's "Motion for Appointment of Counsel/Guardian Ad Litem," ECF Doc. #3 , is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 11/16/22. (IFP motion due 12/7/2022.) (Form sent as directed.) (jfj) |
Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jfj) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (jfj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (jfj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DONALD LEAVINS, J SANTIAGO, filed by STEVEN J GRIFFIN. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (3 service copies received. IFP motion received.) (jfj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.