Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MATHEWS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS and J STREEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
ALLEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
FDOC, DONALD LEAVINS, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24772
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS, PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. SCRUGGS et al
as 3:2023cv24768
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
SCRUGGS, B WENTZ, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNSIDE v. DAVIS-COTTON et al
as 3:2023cv24701
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BURNSIDE
Defendant:
C DAVIS-COTTON, DONALD LEAVINS, P RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOXSON v. LEAVINS
as 3:2023cv24670
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE DANIEL BLOXSON
Respondent:
DONALD LEAVINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Robinson v. Donald Leavins, et al
as 23-13465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD LEAVINS, BROWN, CPT, HUGHES, CPT and others
BLAKE v. SAMMIS et al
as 3:2023cv21819
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
SAMMIS, M LOWE, CATNOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYSON v. SHIVER
as 3:2023cv14417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRYSON
Defendant:
J SHIVER, DONALD LEAVINS, J D PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
