ALLEN v. DIXON et al
| DERRICK ALLEN |
| FDOC, DONALD LEAVINS, CHARLES RICKS, J.D. PITTMAN, S. THOMAS, J. MCNEESE, Z. SCRUGGS, C.L. FERRIGNO, LT T. FENDLASON, C. DAVIS-COTTON, RICKY D DIXON and T. FENDLASON |
| 4:2024cv00077 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Because Defendants did not unanimously consent to removal and the removal was untimely, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the District Court: GRANT Fendlason and Davis-Cotton's Motion to Remand, Doc. #10 . REMAND this case to the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida. DIRECT the clerk of the court to take all steps necessary to effect the remand and close this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 03/14/24. R&R flag set. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/11/2024.) (jfj) |
| Filing 11 Motion of Objection to Petition for Removal, by DERRICK ALLEN, re #10 MOTION to Remand and or Remain in State Court. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #11 Motion of Objection to Petition for Removal, by DERRICK ALLEN, re #10 MOTION to Remand and or Remain in State Court. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #10 MOTION to Remand AND/OR REMAIN IN STATE COURT by FENDLASON and. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand AND/OR REMAIN IN STATE COURT by FENDLASON and by C. DAVIS-COTTON. (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 NOTICE OF FILING FOR PETITION FOR REMOVAL, #1 Notice of Removal. (jcw) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by MALLORY BENNETT BROWN on behalf of T. FENDLASON (BROWN, MALLORY) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MALLORY BENNETT BROWN on behalf of C. DAVIS-COTTON (BROWN, MALLORY) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING FOR PETITION FOR REMOVAL by T. FENDLASON and by C. DAVIS-COTTON re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Intent to Sue/Waiver of Sovereign Immunity, #3 Exhibit Motion to Issue Acknowledgment of New Case and Release Record, #4 Exhibit Motion Requesting Order Directing the Clerk to Issue Summons, #5 Exhibit Affidavit of Indigence Status) (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by C. DAVIS-COTTON. (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS R THOMPSON on behalf of T. FENDLASON (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS R THOMPSON on behalf of C. DAVIS-COTTON (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by T. FENDLASON AND C. DAVIS-COTTON from Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Florida, case number 2023-CA-001859. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-8623103.), filed by T. FENDLASON. (THOMPSON, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
