Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kinner v. Various FDOC Agents
as 3:2026cv02372
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Various FDOC Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KOBY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2026cv00445
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER KOBY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #14 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marco Cadejuste v. REP, et al
as 26-12650
Plaintiff:
MARCO CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
REP, SEC, S. MILIKEN, Indiv & Official Capacity, A. COCHRAN, Secretary FDOC Representive and others
Marco Cadejuste v. REP, et al
as 26-11484
Plaintiff:
MARCO CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
REP, sec, S. MILIKEN, Indiv & Official Capacity, A. COCHRAN, Secretary FDOC Representive and others
Warfield v. Wines et al
as 4:2026cv04075
Plaintiff:
Kelly Warfield
Defendant:
Officer Wines, Morgan Dupee, David Spangleberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. FDOC Secretary et al
as 3:2026cv00759
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
FDOC Secretary, Warden Allen, Chaplin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. FDOC
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
FDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Franklin v. US, et al
as 26-10840
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
US, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES and others
Grimage v. Dixon et al
as 3:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Grimage
Defendant:
Secretary, FDOC Ricky Dixon, Sherri Starling and Lieutenant Caleb Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Franklin v. President of the United States of America, et al
as 26-10394
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
