LAWSON v. LUKE et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LAWSON
Defendant: LUKE, SMITH, MCQURRIE, BARWICK, FLOWERS and WASHINGTON
Case Number: 4:2007cv00259
Filed: June 5, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: ALLAN KORNBLUM
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM STAFFORD
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Adopting 63 Report and Recommendation. The defendants' motions to dismiss and/or for summary judgment docs. 40 , 41 , and 59 are GRANTED. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust, for failure to state a claim, and for filing false and malicious allegations. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 01/13/09. (dlt)
December 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 MOTION for an Order to Show Cause Why Plaintiff's Claims Should Not Be Construed As Perjury or Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed re 1 Complaint filed by BARWICK, 41 MOTION for Summary Ju dgment filed by MCQUEARY, 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MCQUEARY : It is recommended Granting Motions and Case Dismissed. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 12/9/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/6/2009. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAWSON v. LUKE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LAWSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LUKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCQURRIE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARWICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLOWERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?