Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wade et al v. Garst et al
as 5:2026cv00083
Plaintiff:
Frank Wesley Wade and William Townsley Wade, Jr.
Defendant:
Marsha Garst, Austin Armentrout, Corporal Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Washington III v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2026cv00205
Plaintiff:
Donald Washington III
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BERLINGER et al v. Driscoll's Inc.
as 5:2026cv06444
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BERLINGER, ROBERT DUXLER, FRANCESCA HAMMERSMITH and others
Defendant:
Driscoll's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Washington v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2026cv00465
Plaintiff:
Corey Maurice Washington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01847
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDaniel v. Washington County Service Authority
as 1:2026cv00061
Plaintiff:
Emilee Deskins McDaniel
Defendant:
Washington County Service Authority
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
L.J. et al v. Regence BlueShield Washington
as 2:2026cv02209
Plaintiff:
L. J. and P. J.
Defendant:
REGENCE BLUESHIELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6707
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01829
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
