THOMAS v. BUSS
Petitioner: CURTIS THOMAS, JR
Respondent: EDWIN G BUSS
Case Number: 4:2011cv00164
Filed: April 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Okaloosa
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 14 ) is GRANTED, and the § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY. The Clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in informa pauperis areDENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on January 30, 2014. (kvg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS v. BUSS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: EDWIN G BUSS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CURTIS THOMAS, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?