Cases 1 - 10 of 209
SISK v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2018cv00404
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01855
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markiece Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Julie Jones, Eric Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SISK v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01789
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., KENNETH GRAY and others
Fourth Party Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Ramirez v. Department of Corrections
as 14-10359
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Edwin G. Buss
TOOMBS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2013cv02041
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER and EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
TONY TOOMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Lauderdale, Jr. v. Kenneth Tucker, et al
as 13-13086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL WAYNE LAUDERDALE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH S. TUCKER, EDWIN G. BUSS, DAVID PEAVY and others
Lokmar Abdul-Wadood v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOKMAR YAZID ABDUL-WADOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, JIM WYNN, BRYAN PEARSON and others
LAUDERDALE v. TUCKER et al
as 5:2013cv00168
Defendant:
KENNETH S TUCKER , EDWIN G BUSS , DAVID PEAVY and others
Plaintiff:
CARL WAYNE LAUDERDALE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Honorable v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Honorable
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon , Edwin G Buss , Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
