WILLIAMS v. HANCOCK et al
| PHILLIP A WILLIAMS |
| DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JOHN HANCOCK |
| 4:2021cv00194 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED for failure to comply with court orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 41.1 and for want of prosecution. See also Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (While dismissal is an extraordinary remedy, dismissal upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been forewarned, generally is not an abuse of discretion.) It is further recommended that Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. #6 , be DENIED as MOOT and that the case be CLOSED. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 06/28/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/26/2021. (rcb)
|
| Filing 7 Letter with attachments from PHILLIP A WILLIAMS (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #7 Letter with attachments. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb)**IFP motion nor fee paid by 6/25/2021** |
| Filing 6 MOTION for compensation by PHILLIP A WILLIAMS. (blb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (blb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's "motion" demand letter, ECF No. #4 , is DENIED as an improper motion. Plaintiff shall have until 6/25/2021, to file a proper motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff the proper forms for Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have until 6/25/2021, to file an amended complaint in compliance with this Order. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form. If Plaintiff no longer desires to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) by 6/25/2021. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 6/25/2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 5/25/21. (blb) *Forms Provided*
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION FOR COMPENSATION. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (blb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR COMPENSATION by PHILLIP A WILLIAMS. (blb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with attachment by PHILLIP A WILLIAMS. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JOHN HANCOCK, filed by PHILLIP A WILLIAMS. (rcb)**No service copy received** |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
