ROYAL v. GABBY
| VANESSA STAR ROYAL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GABBY |
| 4:2023cv00104 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MIDORI A LOWRY |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO 2241 PETITION re #8 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.(US Attorney's response due on or before: 7/11/2023., Petitioner's replies due no later than 8/14/2023). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY on 5/11/2023. The clerk is directed to substitute Warden Gabby for the United States as the Respondent in this action. The clerk shall forward a copy of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #8 ) and this order to Respondent and the United States Attorney for this District. (kdm) (Mailed as directed above.)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY notified that action is needed Re: #8 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Received two (2) service copies). (kdm) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by VANESSA STAR ROYAL. (Received two (2) service copies.) (Parties will be updated only after the court has reviewed the amended complaint and specifically directed the Clerk to add the additional parties reflected in the amended complaint.) (kdm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 MOTION to Exceed Page Limitation. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/12/2023. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner a petition form for use in Section 2241 cases. This case number and the words Amended Petition should be written on the form. Within thirty days of the date of this order, mindful of the guidance set forth herein, Petitioner must file an amended habeas petition. (kdm) (Mailed as directed above.)
|
| Set Deadline per #7 ORDER: First Amended Petition due by 5/12/2023. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY notified that action is needed Re: #6 Habeas Corpus Filing fee Received. (kdm) |
| Filing 6 Habeas Corpus Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 1-16. Fee status updated to paid. (kdm) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the clerk to send Petitioner a blank IFP form signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY on 3/17/23. ( IFP or Fee due by 4/19/2023.) (bkp)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: VANESSA STAR ROYAL, 50389-509, TALLAHASSEE FCI, PO BOX 5000, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32314. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY notified that action is needed Re: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received), #3 MOTION to Exceed Page Limitation. Referred to MIDORI A LOWRY. (kdm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Exceed Page Limitation by VANESSA STAR ROYAL. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by VANESSA STAR ROYAL. (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received.) (kdm) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE MIDORI A LOWRY for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/14/22. (sjb) ( Please use for future filings new judge's initials: 4:23cv104-MW/MAL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
