Cases 1 - 10 of 100
A. H. v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, et al.
as 26-5904
Plaintiff:
A. H.
Defendant:
WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, WYNN LAS VEGAS HOLDINGS, LLC, WYNN AMERICA GROUP, LLC and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL KANE, ATTORNEY and GEOFFREY PARKER, ATTORNEY
Intervenor:
CHLOE C., CHRISTINA T., ELLIE H. and others
Barefield-Wilson v. Mendota Madison Facility et al
as 2:2026cv01390
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barefield-Wilson
Defendant:
Mendota Madison Facility, Gabbi, Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. GABBY
as 5:2026cv00188
Petitioner:
DALE RUSSELL
Respondent:
GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Leithsceal v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv05071
Plaintiff:
Gabby Leithsceal
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A and Just Love Skulls
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
USA v. Ngangnang Mbua
as 26-10375
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gabby Seagol Ngangnang Mbua
Caraballo v. United States Of America
as 1:2026cv22749
Plaintiff:
Gabby Caraballo
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
JACKSON v. GABBY
as 5:2026cv00106
Petitioner:
CAROLYN JACKSON
Defendant:
J GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sinclair v. Girardeau et al
as 4:2026cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Alexus Girardeau, Latiza Dennison, Anna Navaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
