O'QUINN v. VICE et al
JOSEPH M O'QUINN |
VICE, N OLDS, GRAY, SAILOR, GIDDENS, J CORNIELUS, WILKINS, CARAWAY and P ALLEN |
4:2023cv00484 |
November 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious because Plaintiff affirmatively misrepresented his federal litigation history under the penalty of perjury. It is also recommended that the case be CLOSED and that the Order adopting this Report and Recommendation direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and counts as a strike.. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/10/2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 12/13/2023. (rcb) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #7 , is GRANTED to the extent that the case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 12/13/2023. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #7 REPLY TO #6 WITH ATTACHMENT-EXHIBIT A(3). (rcb) |
Filing 7 REPLY TO #6 WITH ATTACHMENT-EXHIBIT A(3) by JOSEPH M O'QUINN. (rcb) Modified to modify the event type on 12/13/2023 (rcb). |
Filing 6 ORDER. Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel," ECF No. #3 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis," ECF No. #2 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as incomplete. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff a copy of this Order along with an IFP application for use by a prisoner plaintiff. Plaintiff shall submit a complete IFP application along with the requisite inmate account statements or, alternatively, pay the $402 filing fee no later than December 8, 2023. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's amended complaint or no later than December 8, 2023. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 11/8/2023. (rcb)**FORMS FORWARDED AS DIRECTED** |
Set Deadline-Re: #6 - Notify Chambers /IFP Motion /Filing Fee due by 12/8/2023. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #5 (11) BLANK SUMMONSES IN A CIVIL ACTION-SGT GIDDENS, SGT VICE, SGT SGT N. OLDS, OFC GRAYM WARDEN P ALLEN, ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DOC OFFICER'S, #3 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 5 (11) BLANK SUMMONSES IN A CIVIL ACTION-SGT GIDDENS, SGT VICE, SGT SGT N. OLDS, OFC GRAYM WARDEN P ALLEN, ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DOC OFFICER'S by JOSEPH M O'QUINN (rcb) |
Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
Filing 3 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by JOSEPH M O'QUINN. (rcb) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOSEPH M O'QUINN. (rcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JOSEPH M O'QUINN. (rcb). **NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2023: #1 Attachments) (kjw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.