Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gray v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv07612
Plaintiff:
Tiffanie Joyce Gray
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
GRAY v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04747
Plaintiff:
RONDA GRAY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray et al v. Simmons Bank
as 4:2026cv00745
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gray doing business as Danagger Resources and TXC Limited LLC
Defendant:
Simmons Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
GRAY v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv05101
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE GRAY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NAIMO v. GRAY LAW GROUP, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv09057
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE G. NAIMO
Defendant:
GRAY LAW GROUP, LLC, DAVID E. GRAY, ESQ., BRUCE D. NIMENSKY, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gray v. Davis
as 6:2026cv00255
Petitioner:
Darvin Wayne Gray
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gentz et al v. Gray et al
as 6:2026cv00350
Plaintiff:
Samuel Gentz and Lindsey Gentz
Defendant:
Travis H. Gray, Jack O'Boyle & Associates, PLLC, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Lawrence Terry v. Andreka Watlington
as 26-1926
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE TERRY
Defendant:
ANDREKA WATLINGTON, SUZANNE H. HAWKINS, HAWKINS LAW LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lindsey v. Johnson et al
as 4:2026cv00616
Plaintiff:
Charles E Lindsey
Defendant:
Mike Johnson, Michael Diepqules, Brain Cave and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
