MITCHELL v. COLVIN
| Elisa Ruth Mitchell |
| CAROLYN COLVIN |
| 4:2024cv00516 |
| December 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/23/2024. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #11 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 NOTICE OF JOINT CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE by ELISA RUTH MITCHELL. (alb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF JOINT CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE by ELISA RUTH MITCHELL (DUNN, JENNIFER) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendant must respond to the complaint within 60 DAYS after notice of the action is given. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of the Complaint. Within 30 DAYS of service of the answer. Within 30 DAYS of service of Plaintiffs memorandum, Defendant shall file and serve a memorandum in support of the Acting Commissioners decision. Within 14 DAYS after service of Defendant's brief, Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief and serve it on the Acting Commissioner. Within fourteen 14 days of this Order, the parties shall discuss consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. If all parties consent, the parties shall execute and return the consent form attached hereto within 21 days. Also, within 21 days, if all parties do not consent, the parties shall file a joint notice of non-consent stating that "all parties do not consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction." Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/19/2024.Response due by 2/18/2025. Memorandum in Support due by 3/20/2025. Memorandum in Opposition due by 4/21/2025. (alb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Jennifer L. Dunn is hereafter permitted to appear before the Court as counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Elisa Ruth Mitchell. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/19/2024. (alb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/19/2024. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 Notice of Appearance. (alb) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings re #9 Order. Consent to Magistrate Judge form Deadline - 1/2/2025. Reply Brief due by 5/5/2025. (alb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by LONG XUAN TRUONG on behalf of Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (TRUONG, LONG) |
| Filing 5 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (alb) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice of Service: AUSA Peter Gunnar Fisher has been added to the docket for service and notice only purposes. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer L. Dunn.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-9185386.) Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer L. Dunn.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-9185386.) by Elisa Ruth Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Motion to Appear PHV with Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (DUNN, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elisa Ruth Mitchell. (DUNN, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed by Elisa Ruth Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint - Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DUNN, JENNIFER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MITCHELL v. COLVIN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elisa Ruth Mitchell | |
| Represented By: | JENNIFER LATSTETTER DUNN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN | |
| Represented By: | PETER GUNNAR FISHER |
| Represented By: | LONG XUAN TRUONG |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
