ANDERSON v. SALDIVAR et al
MICHAEL A ANDERSON |
S PARRISH, JANE/JOHN DOE, KOUSANS, S PAYNE, W NORRIS, S PONDER, SHERRI AMMONS, E T RICHMOND, PAUL MARTIN, JUAN SALDIVAR, JR, J BLACKWOOD and ELIZABETH TRAVERSO |
5:2018cv00182 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Panama City Office |
Gulf |
CHARLES J KAHN |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to CHARLES J KAHN, JR. (alb) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL A ANDERSON. (alb) |
|
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant (alb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL A ANDERSON. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHERRI AMMONS, J BLACKWOOD, JANE/JOHN DOE(CLASS TALLAHASSEE), JANE/JOHN DOE(SECURITY ICT), KOUSANS, PAUL MARTIN, W NORRIS, S PARRISH, S PAYNE, S PONDER, E T RICHMOND, JUAN SALDIVAR, JR, ELIZABETH TRAVERSO, filed by MICHAEL A ANDERSON. (No service copies) (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to CHARLES J KAHN, JR. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.