Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Parrish v. USA
as 3:2022cv05054
Petitioner:
Dustin S. Parrish
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parrish v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv05045
Petitioner:
Dustin S. Parrish
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARRISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04109
Plaintiff:
KYLE S PARRISH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEAVER, JR. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2020cv02784
Defendant:
PAMELA S. PARRISH, JEFFREY S. LEFFLER and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. BEAVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PARRISH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv21844
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BECKY S. PARRISH
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parrish v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 3:2019cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Parrish
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDERSON v. SALDIVAR et al
as 5:2018cv00182
Defendant:
S PARRISH, JANE/JOHN DOE, KOUSANS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01880
Plaintiff:
Natasha S Parrish
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv22383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
