SMITH v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD et al
| SOLOMON E SMITH, III |
| Solomon E. Smith, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FLORIDA, BARRY ROBERTS, RONNIE NELSON, Joel Oquendo and CITY OF SPRINGFIELD |
| 5:2021cv00178 |
| September 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT re #9 Motion to Dismiss; #14 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/1/2021. (jcw)
|
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by SOLOMON E SMITH, III. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by SOLOMON E SMITH, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint) (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by SOLOMON E SMITH, III. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by KAYLA ELIZABETH PLATT RADY on behalf of CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (PLATT RADY, KAYLA) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES re #10 Motion to Stay. All discovery and pretrial deadlines are STAYED pending this Court's resolution of the motion to dismiss, ECF No. #9 , and further order from this Court. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/7/2021. (jcw)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Discovery by CITY OF SPRINGFIELD. (MARSEY, JOHN) |
| Filing 9 DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT by CITY OF SPRINGFIELD. (MARSEY, JOHN) Modified on 10/7/2021 to edit title (jcw). |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jcw) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SEAL ECF NO. #1 re granting #3 Motion to Seal Document #3 MOTION to Seal Document. The document under ECF No. #1 appears to be sealed at this time; however, in the event it is not sealed from the parties' view, the Clerk is directed to seal it. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/7/2021. (jcw)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE Summons to be Issued by SOLOMON E SMITH, III re #2 Complaint (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: In accordance with N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.2, a completed Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44) is to be filed with each civil case. Therefore, please file the civil cover sheet using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet", which is found under "Other Documents". Additionally, the clerk will issue summons upon submission. You may obtain the 2 page summons form by visiting our website @ www.flnd.uscourts.gov. Click on Forms & Publications; national court forms; AO 440 Summons in a Civil Action (revised 6/12). (jcw) (jcw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint by SOLOMON E SMITH. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FLORIDA, RONNIE NELSON, Joel Oquendo, BARRY ROBERTS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6288229.), filed by Solomon E. Smith. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FLORIDA, BARRY ROBERTS, RONNIE NELSON, Joel Oquendo ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6288222.), filed by Solomon E. Smith. (THOMPSON, HAROLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
