Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ryder v. City of Springfield, et al.
as 26-5474
Plaintiff:
CHIARA RYDER
Defendant:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Officer KIRSTEN CARDWELL, in her official capacity, Officer TOM SLABBERT, in his official capacity and others
Butler v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv03274
Plaintiff:
Chavise Butler
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Graham CC, Sangamon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv30135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perkins v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2026cv01673
Plaintiff:
Nolan Anthony Perkins
Defendant:
City of Springfield and Jordan Parado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Claunch et al
as 6:2026cv03471
Plaintiff:
Melody Roberts
Defendant:
Michael Claunch and City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2026cv30127
Plaintiff:
Tiera Jones
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Tamara Betancourt, Javier Caladeron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bowshier v. Griffin et al
as 3:2026cv00269
Plaintiff:
Terry L Bowshier
Defendant:
James N Griffin, C Hernandez, Melissa Upthegrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2026cv03434
Plaintiff:
Edgar Harris and Michele Harris
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Clerks Office, Cathryn Hanaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hadez v. City of Springfield
as 3:2026cv03224
Plaintiff:
Chase Hadez and Colton Lexus
Defendant:
City of Springfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2026cv30106
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Springfield Police Department, Denise Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
