KENDRICK v. DIXON et al
| KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK |
| RICKY D DIXON, BROWN, JACKSON, B TAYLOR, HALL and EDWARD WESLEY |
| 5:2022cv00139 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #13 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. 90 Day Deadline set for destruction of working file 10/31/2022. (alb) (Main Document 14 replaced on 8/1/2022) (alb). |
Filing 13
ORDER. The magistrate judge's #9 Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff initiating a new case accompanied by payment of the full $402.00 fee. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint (Doc. #11 ) is DENIED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall close the case file. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 08/01/2022. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #12 Objection to Report and Recommendations, #11 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint. (alb) |
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's Objection to #9 Report and Recommendations, by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (alb) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint, by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (alb) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/11/2022. (jcw)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. This action be DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), without prejudice to Plaintiff initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $402.00 filing and administrative fee in its entirety. The clerk of court close this case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/8/2022.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/11/2022. (jcw) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Change Venue, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Notice, #2 Memorandum in Support, #4 MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDING, #1 Complaint, #7 Jury Demand. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SIMILAR CASE by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (Notice does not contain a signature block with current address.) (jcw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Change of Venue by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDING by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (jcw) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Complaint by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (Document does not contain a signature block with current address.) (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BROWN, RICKY D DIXON, HALL, JACKSON, B TAYLOR, EDWARD WESLEY, filed by KENNETH JAMES KENDRICK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proposed Summons)(Filing fee was not paid. 1 service copy filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
