PECCI-ANDUJAR v. PARKER et al
JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR |
J PARKER, A KIRKLAND, AUSTIN GULLETT, JANE DOE and UNKNOWN |
5:2023cv00149 |
May 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
MARK E WALKER |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 Order - No response filed. (jcw) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #8 Order. Acknowledgement received from Warden. (jcw) |
Filing 8 ORDER re #7 Letter - The clerk of the court is directed to transmit immediately, via email and/or facsimile, a copy of this order and Plaintiff's letter to Warden Donald Leavins at Santa Rosa Correctional Institution. The clerk of the court shall confirm that such notification was received by Warden Leavins and make an entry on the docket reflecting that such notification was sent and received. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/8/2023. (jcw)(Order and letter emailed to Warden Leavins as directed.) |
Filing 7 Letter by JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR (jcw) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejuddice #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of the court is directed to send Plaintiff: (a) a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and financial affidavit for use by prisoners; and Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District of Florida. This case number should be written on the forms. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, on or before 7/7/2023, Plaintiff shall: (a) pay the $402.00 fee ($350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee) to the clerk of the court; or (b) submit a fully completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, including (1) the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and financial affidavit on the court approved forms, (2) a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a prison official, and (3) a computer printout of the transactions in Plaintiffs inmate trust account during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of this suit. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/7/2023. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR. (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from PENSACOLA Division on 06/01/2023. Case Number 3:23-cv-12173-MCR-ZCB. (alb) |
Filing 3 ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the Panama City Division of this Court and close the file in the Pensacola Division. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 06/01/2023. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (alb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, AUSTIN GULLETT, A KIRKLAND, J PARKER, UNKNOWN, filed by JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR. (No service copies, no IFP motion or fee.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.