Fernandez et al v. Integon National Insurance Company
Daniel Fernandez and Carmen Fernandez |
Integon National Insurance Company |
0:2018cv61601 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ft Lauderdale Office |
Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale) |
Ursula Ungaro |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #9 Transmittal Letter Sent (ebz) |
Filing 9 Transmittal Letter Sent with copy of docket sheet and certified copy of Order of Remand to: 17th Judicial Circuit Court in Broward, FL. State Court Case Number: CACE-18-2889 (12) (ail) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 8/22/2018. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Integon National Insurance Company. Replies due by 8/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Attorney Charles Andrew Tharp)(Oltchick, Brian) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( Initial Planning and Scheduling Conference set for 9/14/2018 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 7/24/2018. See attached document for full details. (ra) |
Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum of Law in Support by Carmen Fernandez, Daniel Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Proano, Jessica) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Integon National Insurance Company re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case of Filing State Court Documents (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs Notice of Electronic Mail Address Designation, #3 Exhibit Plaintiffs Request to Produce to Defendant, #4 Exhibit Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, or, Alternatively, Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Demand for Attorneys Fees and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, #5 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Hearing [MTD], #6 Exhibit Defendants Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTD], #7 Exhibit Order Granting Defendant to Appear Telephonically [MTD], #8 Exhibit Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Request for Production, #9 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Serving 1st Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff, #10 Exhibit Defendants Request to Produce to Plaintiff, #11 Exhibit Plaintiffs Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTD], #12 Exhibit Plaintiffs Waiver of Objection to Production of Documents from Non-Party and Request for Copies, #13 Exhibit Plaintiffs Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTD], #14 Exhibit Defendants Re-Notice of Hearing [MTD], #15 Exhibit Defendants Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTD], #16 Exhibit Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, #17 Exhibit Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Discovery Responses, #18 Exhibit Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Request for Admissions, #19 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Cancellation of Hearing [MTD], #20 Exhibit Defendants Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #21 Exhibit Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Response to Defendants Discovery Requests, #22 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Hearing [MTS], #23 Exhibit Plaintiffs Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTS], #24 Exhibit Defendants Motion to Appear Telephonically [MTS], #25 Exhibit Order Granting Plaintiffs to Appear Telephonically [MTS], #26 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Deposition of Plaintiffs, #27 Exhibit Order Granting Defendants to Appear Telephonically ONLY [MTS], #28 Exhibit Plaintiffs Notice of Serving Unverified Answers to Defendants 1st Set of Interrogatories, #29 Exhibit Plaintiffs Response to Defendant Request for Production, #30 Exhibit Plaintiffs Notice of Serving Verified Answers to Defendants 1st Set of Interrogatories, #31 Exhibit Plaintiffs Supplemental Response to Defendants Request for Production, #24, #32 Exhibit Defendants Notice of Removal from State Court) (Oltchick, Brian) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. State Court Complaint not included. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the State Court Complaint attached within 24 hours. (cbr) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10814683, filed by Integon National Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Public Record from Broward County Prop Appraiser, #3 Exhibit Florida Dept. of State, Div of Corporations, #4 Exhibit Integon Policy, #5 Exhibit Integon Claims Decision Letter Dtd 10/11/2017, #6 Exhibit P. Veri Ans to D. 1st Set of Interrogatories, #7 Exhibit Expert Claims Adjuster's Estimate Dtd 5/13/2018)(Oltchick, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.