Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34241
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23994
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fernandez v. Blinken
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Fernando Daniel Fernandez
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
J B C E L L C v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2021cv04027
Plaintiff:
J B C E L L C doing business as Roof Advisor L L C
Defendant:
Daniel Fernandez, Gerard Glen & Co L L C and Fernandez Ltd Partnership
Counter Defendant:
J B C E L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14915
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Fernandez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11040
Petitioner:
DANIEL FERNANDEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bingham v. Fernander et al
as 1:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Andrew Nino and Daniel Fernandez
Plaintiff:
William E Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilma Marquez De Paz, et al v. William Barr
as 20-71689
Petitioner:
JOSUE DANIEL FERNANDEZ MARQUEZ, GILMA E. MARQUEZ DE PAZ, AKA Marina Elena Babichi Alvarado and ANDREA MICHAELL FERNANDEZ MARQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
