Simmons v. Social Security Administration
| Daniel L. Simmons |
| Social Security Administration |
| 0:2018cv62263 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration., Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ebz) |
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Prepare Summons for Service. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall, on or before 11/9/2018, prepare the summonses and have them issued by the Clerk of the Court for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 10/29/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered and Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters and for a Report and Recommendation on al1 dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/25/2018. See attached document for full details. (dq)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel L. Simmons. (lk) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (lk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Daniel L. Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simmons v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel L. Simmons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
